AND ALLIGATORS ARE VERY DIFFERENT
Florida reported another alligator attack last week. As more people invade alligator habitat in southern states, we have (or at least should have) come to expect such news during the warmer months of the year. Contact between us and them is steadily increasing. Ironically, humans, the invasive species, are the ones who become offended when another species takes objection to our presence.
I do not want to belittle or trivialize the traumatic experience suffered by anyone who has been injured by an alligator or had a family member, friend, or pet actually killed by one. However, a comparison between American alligators and some crocodiles is worth considering, if for no other reason than to show how a truly aggressive species copes with interlopers. The saltwater crocodiles of Australia are very different from American alligators in their response to humans-they will attack and eat people. These are the reptile world's equivalent of great white sharks or Bengal tigers. They frequent ocean habitats as well as rivers and freshwater marshes near where people live. Their maximum size is enormous, more than 20 feet. A crocodile only 15 feet long could easily kill and swallow a full-grown man.
Despite prevailing views about the sanctity of human life, some predators view people as simply another source of protein. And people living in areas where such attacks are common often develop different attitudes from what we are accustomed to. For example, one journalist noted that people inhabiting the Northern Territory in Australia "seemed almost jubilant whenever someone was taken by a crocodile." When a "mineworker met a grisly death in the jaws of a giant crocodile" in a national park, many of the residents in the Northern Territory displayed "widespread and bizarre delight" that the crocodile had been victorious.
Once when I visited the region near Darwin, Australia, someone was killed and eaten by a saltwater crocodile in the Adelaide River. The local folk I talked with the next day were seemingly unmoved by the incident. Why the lack of compassion by the residents? Because, as someone said, they view themselves as "rugged frontiersmen carving out an existence in an untamed wilderness." They reject even the hint of a suggestion that the crocodile population be reduced in any way.
attitude about the saltwater crocodile by old-time residents is based
on the principle that the rivers of northern Australia belong to the crocodile.
If humans want to share the waters and adjoining land, they must assess
the risks of these giant predators and be prepared to live (or die) with
them. This is my image of the pioneering spirit of early America, which
differs dramatically from the attitude of most Americans today.
Some people consider American alligators a menace because they occasionally attack people, but this seldom happens without some provocation. Almost all alligator attacks can be traced back to human irresponsibility of some sort, including people feeding alligators. Yet, if an animal causes harm to people, we hold the animal responsible, without considering that we may have entered its natural environment, threatened its young, and destroyed its habitat. Maybe Americans need to be more accepting of the nature of wild animals and more willing to share the environment with them. This doesn't mean we need acquiesce to the idea that humans are acceptable prey items, but none of our native species are typically out to make a meal of us.
alligator attacks or other unfortunate encounters with nature we must
consider the rules of safety and probabilities of risk when dealing with
any animal that could bite, trample, scratch, sting, or otherwise injure
us. Developing an attitude that we must be the responsible ones and not
the animals themselves will be a good first step.