WATER
IS ONE OF OUR MOST VALUABLE RESOURCES
by Whit Gibbons
November 24, 2003
Water
is undeniably one of our most valuable and vital resources. The impending
lawsuits between Georgia, Alabama, and Florida to determine who uses
the water from the Chattahoochee River should confirm that water is
precious. Could the Savannah River become a target for providing a long-distance
water resource for Atlanta? After all, one bank of the river belongs
to Georgia and the other to South Carolina. In fact, every river that
touches two different states could become a battle zone for who owns
what.
A
recent book on the subject of natural waters addresses many of the issues
that will have to be considered in such controversies, now and far into
the future. The book, "Principles of Water Resources" (John
Wiley & Sons, 2003) by Thomas V. Cech, seems suitable as a college
textbook. But whether you are in a classroom or not, the book provides
a foundation for understanding virtually all aspects of water, as part
of the physical environment of the world and as a critical resource
for all living things, especially humans. An overview of the book discloses
some water issues that must be considered.
Halfway
through the book is a chapter entitled "Water Allocation Law."
The first point to be aware of when dealing with water wars is that
written records in Babylonian law document that people have been fighting
over water for thousands of years. Mesopotamia, between the Tigris and
Euphrates and including the region of Iraq, was one of the critical
regions because of the low rainfall (about eight inches a year). According
to the book, "multiple years of drought were common." If you
are like me, thinking about having a drought when a normal year has
less than a foot of rain sounds kind of ominous. The Babylonians clearly
had reasons to make laws about who got to use water and how. The main
point, however, is that conflicts over water started long ago, and predictions
are they are going to get even worse over the next few years.
One
of the chapters in the book is called "Federal Water Agencies."
Now, I imagine that in Babylonia or the Roman Empire, when a king or
an emperor was making the final decision, no sovereignty had more than
one water agency. But in the United States we have no fewer than 12
federal agencies that make decisions about water. Is anyone surprised
that it is sometimes difficult to resolve conflicts that arise when
we have a dozen authorities that could potentially be involved? Thus
we might see a divergence of opinion between the Army Corps of Engineers
and the Fish and Wildlife Service. The Environmental Protection Agency
might have a different view about water quality than the U.S. Geological
Survey (which includes most of the nation's amphibian biologists who
work for the government). The upshot is that the federal positions about
water use, quality, and regional value can vary greatly, so when state
and private concerns are added to the mix, the legal waters are sure
to become muddied.
The
book has comprehensive accounts about all the other basic aspects of
natural waters, such as sections on water pollution, water chemistry,
waterborne diseases, and wastewater treatment. And the absolutely essential
chapter on water and the environment makes it clear that we need to
keep the aesthetics of living in the formula as well as the necessities
of having water to drink, navigate over, and run industries. If you
want to catch up on the rising water conflicts in certain regions of
the country (such as Alabama vs. Florida vs. Georgia, or Northern vs.
Southern California) the details are given in a chapter devoted to such
wrangles. In typical textbook style, recommended readings on specific
topics are at the end of each chapter, along with suggested Web sites
and videos.
A
sentence in the water allocation law chapter of Cech's book sums up
a key perspective about water: "Conflict over scarce water resources
continues today and will increase as the world's population grows and
environmental concerns deepen." All nations, states, and communities
should keep this thought in mind. Such conflicts are sure to affect
many of them.
If you have an environmental question or comment, email 