![]() |
||
|
SREL Reprint #2942
|
||
|
|
Efficacy of Marking Snakes with Disposable Medical Cautery Units Christopher T. Winne1, John D. Willson1, Kimberly M. Andrews1, and Robert N. Reed2 1Savannah
River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken, SC 29803 USA Abstract:
In many situations, marking snakes for recapture purposes is fraught
with difficulty. Toe clipping has obvious drawbacks for snakes, and
externally attached tags are easily lost via shedding or abrasion against
surface objects. Passive integrated transponders (PIT tags) have near
100% reliability and are typically permanent if correctly implanted
(Gibbons and Andrews 2004). However, PIT tags are expensive (a minimum
of US $3.50 per tag if purchased in large numbers) and in many field
studies the recapture rates of snakes are too low to justify their use.
Even if funding is unlimited, the limited girth of some neonates and
small species precludes the use of PIT tags (Gibbons and Andrews 2004). SREL Reprint #2942 Winne, C. T., J. D. Willson, K. M. Andrews, and R. N. Reed. 2006. Efficacy of Marking Snakes with Disposable Medical Cautery Units. Herpetological Review 37(1): 52-54.
|
|